Date: Tuesday, May 27th, 2025
Meeting Type: Brief public session followed by executive session
Context
The Robinson School feasibility study mentioned in the broader town budget discussions, where the town is using MSBA grant funding to move forward with the feasibility stage. The executive session suggests active negotiations or discussions regarding real property related to the school project.
Note: The actual substantive discussions occurred in executive session and are not part of the public record.
Administrative Details
Attendance:
- Present: 8 committee members total
- In-person/Remote: Hybrid meeting format via Zoom webinar
- Committee Members: Kristen, Dr. Chew, Lindsay, John, Tom, Kevin, Jeff, and Allison
- Notable: Tom Clay’s attendance was uncertain; Steve Taylor could not attend
- Technical Issues: Allison joined while driving and experienced some connectivity problems
Meeting Logistics
- Duration: Very brief public session (approximately 5-10 minutes)
- Format: Zoom webinar with separate executive session link for security
- Public Participation: No public attendees or comments
Key Actions
Motion Passed: The committee voted unanimously to adjourn to executive session to:
- Consider the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property
- Authorized town staff Joe and Jeff to join the executive session
- Chair declared that open meeting discussion could have detrimental effect on negotiating position
Roll Call Vote Results: All members voted “I” (in favor)
Meeting Structure
- Public Session: Limited to administrative matters and motion to enter executive session
- Executive Session: Committee did not return to public session and adjourned from executive session
- Separate Zoom Links: Used different Zoom links for public vs. executive sessions for security/privacy
View the agenda. Watch the entire meeting here:
___________________________________
Date: Tuesday, June 3rd, 2025
Meeting Type: Public session focused on Request for Services (RFS) document development
Primary Focus: Owner’s Project Manager (OPM) Selection Process
Main Objective: Prepare Request for Services document to hire an Owner’s Project Manager once MSBA approves the feasibility study agreement on June 18th. *[The MSBA, or Massachusetts School Building Authority, is a state agency that funds capital improvement projects in public schools across Massachusetts.]
Key Document Development Areas
Project Cost Range:
- Will use SMMA facilities assessment numbers, adjusted for current enrollment projections (450-750 students vs. previous 350-700)
- Inflate costs to account for 2+ years of construction timing
- Expected range: $50-100 million depending on scope (renovation vs. new construction)
*[SMMA stands for Symmes Maini & McKee Associates. SMMA is an architectural, engineering, and interior design firm that completed a comprehensive facilities assessment for the Westford Public Schools in early 2023. The assessment was done to identify facility and educational needs for the next ten years, and it identified the Colonel John Robinson School as having the most significant needs.]
Evaluation Criteria Established:
- Past Performance: MSBA project experience, budget/schedule compliance, change order management
- Safety Record: Accidents, fines, legal actions
- Code Knowledge: Massachusetts State Building Code, ADA compliance, other regulations
- Procurement Expertise: Commonwealth construction procurement laws, Chapter 149A experience
- Management Approach: Team structure, project management tools, stakeholder communication
- Key Personnel: Team qualifications and experience
- Capacity/Skills: Subcontractor relationships, third-party testing experience
- Current Workload: Available capacity for project timeline
- Schedule Management: Experience managing complex project schedules
- Cost Control: Change order management, budget oversight
- Financial Stability: Firm’s financial health
- References: Previous client feedback
Timeline Developed
- June 18: MSBA votes on feasibility study agreement
- June 25: RFS (Request for Service) document submission deadline to MSBA for review
- July 2: RFS posting goes live (3-week response period)
- July 25: Responses due from OPM firms
- August 8: Short-list finalization (2-week review period)
- Week of August 18-25: Interviews with short-listed firms
- Target: September 8th MSBA review panel (may slip to October 6th)
Committee Structure Decisions
- Will create evaluation subcommittee (not entire 9-person committee required)
- Subcommittee will review submissions and conduct interviews
- Full committee will vote on final selection
Administrative Notes
- Attendance: 10 committee members present (Kristen Las, Dr. Chew, Lindsay Richard, John Cunningham, Tom Wimberg, Kevin LaCoste, Jeff Goodwin, Allison Cammarata, Stephen Taylor & Valery Young)
- Technical Lead: Lindsay leading RFS development (professional expertise in this area)
- Staff Support: Mike Edwards assisting with document preparation
- Next Meeting: June 17th to finalize and vote on RFS document
- Website Update: robinson-msba.org domain secured, WordPress site in development
Key Concerns Addressed
- Summer Timeline: Tight schedule with July 4th holiday affecting response timeline
- MSBA Review Requirements: Need clarification on review timeframes
- Experience Requirements: Emphasis on MCPPO certification (minimum 2+ years), building committee experience *[MCPPO stands for Massachusetts Certified Public Purchasing Official.]
- Third-Party Testing: Important based on library project lessons learned
Executive Session Note
Committee held prior executive session on site locations (details confidential).
Meeting Duration: Approximately 1.5 hours, focused entirely on RFS document development and selection process planning.
View the agenda. Watch the entire meeting here:
____________________________________
Date: Tuesday, June 17th, 2025
Meeting Type: Public session reviewing finalized RFS document and updated timeline
Key Timeline Update from MSBA
Major Change: The OPM selection process has been significantly delayed due to MSBA meeting schedules. The OPM won’t be on board until November or December (instead of the previously planned September timeline).
New Timeline Options:
- November 3rd MSBA Review Panel:
- Place ad in Central Register by August 28th
- Responses due mid-to-late September
- OPM package to MSBA by early October
- December Review Panel: All dates shift one month later
RFS Document Finalization
Key Changes Made:
- Simplified Evaluation Criteria: Reduced specific criteria from 9-10 to 5 major categories to streamline the evaluation process
- Cleaned up formatting: Removed red-line edits from previous draft
- Project objectives: Finalized specific objectives for the feasibility study
Final Evaluation Criteria Structure:
- Firm Experience (15% weight) – Multiple sub-bullets covering MSBA project experience
- Project Team and Key Personnel (45% weight) – Org chart, capacity, skills, working relationships, LEED familiarity, life cycle cost analysis
- Project Understanding and Approach (25% weight)
- Capacity and Resources (5% weight)
- Review of References (10% weight)
Administrative Decisions
Document Process:
- Committee decided not to vote on the RFS document today
- Will allow for continued back-and-forth with MSBA before final committee approval
- MSBA will review draft version to help committee “get in line” for the process
Scope of Services Enhancement:
- Mike and Lindsay will refine the scope to ensure OPM handles all responsibilities
- Lessons learned from library project: want OPM and architect doing “everything” with minimal committee lift
- Goal: Committee makes decisions, contractors do the work
Future Meeting Schedule
- July 15th: Check-in meeting (Dr. Chew may not attend due to superintendent summer meeting conflict)
- August 12th: Final vote on RFS before posting, create selection committee, site research update
- Meetings may be cancelled if no decision points needed
Ongoing Items
- Website Development: robinson-msba.org progressing slowly due to end-of-school-year schedules
- Site Research: Land use department continuing research on additional parcels (executive session topic)
- MSBA Orientation: Several committee members attending Module 2 orientation covering project team formation
Administrative Notes
- Attendance: Full committee present (9 members)
- Meeting Duration: Approximately 30 minutes (gave back 30 minutes to attendees)
- June 3rd Minutes: Approved unanimously
- Next Steps: Committee will wait for MSBA feedback on draft RFS document before final approval
Key Outcome: Extended timeline reduces pressure on summer scheduling while maintaining momentum toward OPM selection process.
View the agenda. Watch the entire meeting here:
*Edits made on 7/3/25
