FORGE VILLAGE — A proposal to demolish and replace an existing home along Forge Pond will undergo additional review after the Conservation Commission raised concerns about tree removal and the stability of a steep slope near the water.
The commission reviewed plans Sept. 23 for 7 Weber Road, where the applicant proposes to remove an existing dwelling, deck, and shed, along with about 23 trees. The plans call for construction of a new home, deck, paved driveway, walkway, septic system, and utilities within 100 feet of Forge Pond and nearby wetland resource areas.
The existing one-story, three-bedroom home sits near the top of a steep slope along the southeast side of Forge Pond. The proposed replacement home would be positioned farther from the pond while attempting to preserve required buffer areas. A bordering vegation wetland is also located on the opposite side of Weber Road.
Much of the commission’s discussion centered on trees proposed for removal near the pond. Project representatives said several large pine trees are planned to come down and suggested smaller trees could remain or eventually take their place.
Commission members, however, questioned whether removing the trees could affect the stability of the steep slope leading toward Forge Pond.
Members discussed having an arborist evaluate the trees, including whether they pose safety risks and what effect their removal could have on the slope. The commission ultimately voted unanimously to authorize its agent to hire an arborist or other qualified professional to conduct a tree and risk assessment, with the applicant responsible for funding the review.
The applicant also expressed willingness to develop a replanting plan for the area. Possible options discussed included leaving tree stumps in place temporarily to help stabilize the bank and planting vegetation better suited to the site and floodplain conditions.
The project would also replace an existing 60-gallon cesspool with a new septic system. The proposed system is designed for three bedrooms, according to project representatives.
Commission members also discussed the property’s potential for a future accessory dwelling unit. Representatives acknowledged that while an ADU may be allowed under state zoning rules, the site’s wetlands buffers, septic limitations and other constraints could make adding a separate structure difficult.
A nearby resident spoke in favor of the redevelopment during the hearing, calling the proposal an improvement for the neighborhood.
Commission members agreed that a site visit would help them better understand the proposed house location, slope and trees slated for possible removal.
Members voted unanimously to continue the public hearing to Oct. 14, allowing time for additional review of the property and proposed tree removal.
